Criminal Defence
Notable cases:
R v FAD
Represented a young defendant charged with importing cannabis valued at over £500,000. Following early guilty plea, extensive mitigation, and international enquiries, the client received a four-month suspended sentence with no conditions. A result described by the Judge as “exceptional.”
R v ME
Jonathan Laidlaw KC and Gabriele Watts acted for the first defendant who was a high-net-worth businessman and son-in-law of the late Harrods owner. The complainant alleged that he had been robbed by his brother-in-law, sister and two security guards. The incident was alleged to have taken place at their family home and the allegation had already been the subject of high-profile civil litigation that settled before the criminal proceedings began. Following an application to stay the case as an abuse of process, the CPS offered no evidence, and not guilty verdicts were returned.
R v KD
Represented a defendant charged with false imprisonment, non-fatal suffocation and assault at Isleworth Crown Court. He was charged on a joint-enterprise basis. The defendant was a man of good character, and the defence case throughout was that KD had been a witness to the incident and had consistently provided a full and detailed account at every opportunity, denying his involvement in any criminal offences. Following written and oral submissions at Court, the Judge directed the CPS to conduct a full review of the case. The CPS offered no evidence, and the defendant was acquitted.
R v AL
Represented the first defendant in a joint enterprise at Isleworth Crown Court. The case concerned a nine-count indictment, which included multiple counts of armed robbery, section 18 (GBH), and firearms. Successful half time submissions were made in relation to the section 18 and firearms, and the defendant was acquitted of all remaining counts barring one robbery.
R v XX
Represented a former senior civil servant charged with racially aggravated assault. The defendant pleaded guilty, but following submissions the court agreed to use their discretion to step outside the sentencing guidelines and issued a fine.
R v SB
Defended in a joint-enterprise robbery at Harrow Crown Court. Following cross examination of the complainant, a number of weaknesses in the case were exposed that had significantly undermined the prosecution’s case. The trial was stopped, and the defendant was acquitted.
R v MG
Defended in a multi-handed conspiracy to supply Class A and Class B and possession of criminal property at Inner London Crown Court. The case was listed for a 2-day Newton hearing. A man collapsed and died, and the cause of death was believed to be consumption of drugs. An investigation was launched, and a large drugs line was discovered, including large quantities of cash. The defendant later abandoned the Newton hearing on the day but 20% credit was still secured. He was sentenced to 4 years 6 months in prison despite a finding of “significant role” (and category 2 harm).
R v JM
Defended in a section 18 (with section 20 as the alternative), which was alleged to have been committed in a domestic context. The case was transferred from the Central Criminal Court to Isleworth Crown Court, and later sat in the Nightingale Court at the Barbican. Following a week-long trial, the defendant was acquitted of all counts.