International, Sanctions & Extradition
Christina has a keen interest in cases with a cross-border involvement – whether extradition, INTERPOL or Mutual Legal Assistance. She enjoys working with foreign clients, lawyers, and experts, as she is fascinated by the contrasts and interactions between different legal systems.
She has extensive defence extradition experience from her time as a partner at Boutique Law LLP, involving actual or potential extradition requests from many countries including Albania, France, Greece, India, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, and the USA. Many of the cases in which she has been involved have been high-profile, complex and /or politically sensitive cases. She has advised on strategy and carried out substantive case preparation, including assisting with the drafting of court submissions at both first instance and appeal levels. Her cases have included successful ECHR Article 8 claims. Her extradition work and research mean that she is also familiar with the intersection of extradition with asylum, and immigration law, and she has worked with immigration lawyers to ensure comprehensive case strategies.
Christina has also drafted submissions to INTERPOL requesting deletion and has advised on other INTERPOL matters, such as the effect of INTERPOL policies on refugee status.
Having spent time within the United Kingdom Central Authority, Christina has an excellent understanding of Mutual Legal Assistance. Her client in a civil restitution case benefitted from an argument about the lawfulness of the FCA’s use of Mutual Legal Assistance obtained from a European country. This led to a walkaway settlement, including a discontinuation of the criminal prosecution.
She has also liaised extensively with foreign lawyers in many countries to obtain their advice on extradition and confiscation regimes in their countries, and the risks run by clients wishing to travel to those countries, either when an INTERPOL Red Notice might be in existence or where there is a risk of a politically-motivated extradition request.
Notable Cases:
A state v P
Christina was closely involved at the first instance and high court appeal stages of this extradition case which subsequently reached the Supreme Count on an ECHR Article 5 and 6 issue. The underlying offences were abuse of office. The case involved several experts, including foreign lawyers, and required gathering of factual evidence and an understanding and analysis of the local prosecution and law, prison issues and foreign law.
A state v M
This was an extremely high- profile case in the requesting state. The case involved a complex commercial background following a business collapse. The defence case relied on experts in banking, aviation, prison conditions as well as a medical expert.
A state v V
The client’s extradition was successfully resisted on Article 8 grounds (principally ill health). The requesting state did not appeal.
Christina advised a client during witness preparation with the Department of Justice where the client had reached a non-prosecution agreement with the Department of Justice.
Christina advised high-profile clients who were caught up in a financial political scandal in an Asian country. Christina drafted submissions to INTERPOL in relation to potential Red Notices. She also liaised extensively with foreign lawyers so that the clients could risk assess whether or not to travel to particular countries they needed to visit. This involved ensuring that the effect of a Red Notice and the extradition process in each country was well understood, and that local lawyers would be available in the event of any difficulties.