2 Hare Court | London Barristers Chambers - One of the UK's leading sets
News 23/03/2018

Naeem Mian QC’s client was charged with offences contrary to section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2006.

He was being prosecuted at the age of 16 for terrorism offences that he was alleged to have committed when he was 14. This case was only the third occasion on which a terrorism trial has been conducted in the Youth Court. The judge was the Chief Magistrate of England and Wales.

The client was a child of good character who had been “Statemented” (assessed by the education authority as having “special needs”). Both the Defence Consultant Neuropsychologist and Prosecution Consultant Psychiatrist agreed that he suffers from Autism Spectrum Disorder, has difficulty in understanding social interaction and is therefore socially isolated and considered vulnerable. Despite this, the prosecution continued. The served evidence in this case was in excess of 46,000 pages.

Following detailed written submissions, Naeem’s client was offered a conditional caution (after 1 year) thereby avoiding a trial and potential terrorism conviction.

Naeem was instructed on this case by Mark Bailey of Bailey, Nicholson Grayson Solicitors.

News 23/03/2018

Related Expertise

Popular news

R v Broughton Clarifying Causation in Gross Negligence Manslaughter

SUMMARY In 2017 a 24-year-old woman, Louella Fletcher Michie, died at the Bestival Music Festival,…

Sentencing for Robbery

On 28 January 2016 the Sentencing Council published the new Definitive Guidelines for offences of…

Portfolio Builder

Select the practice areas that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)