Kate Bex

Kate Bex

Kate Bex

Cited byThe Legal 500 and Chambers UK as a leading junior, Kate is a highly regarded criminal advocate who both defends and prosecutes. She specialises in serious and complex crime especially offences of murder and non fatal violence.

Increasingly instructed as leading counsel, her recent cases include the race-fixing trial at the CCC which resulted in dismissal, and subsequent regulatory proceedings before the British Horseracing Authority which concluded with the first Goodyear indication outside a criminal court. Kate was leading counsel for the defence in an AIM flotation scheme (designated a serious and complex fraud, believed to be the first prosecution under the s25 FSMA 2000), and leading counsel for the prosecution against a silk and junior, successfully arguing for the admission of a previous acquittal following R v Z and the CJA 2003.

Kate is also an accredited mediator for alternative dispute resolution of civil and commercial disputes and is an associate member of ADR Chambers. Kate's experience of the mediation process makes her perfectly placed to act as a mediation advocate in civil asset recovery proceedings brought by SOCA.

She also undertakes professional disciplinary work, and in particular appears regularly before disciplinary panels and the High Court in General Medical Council matters. Kate also has experience of appearing before a number of other regulators, including the GSCC, and sits as a Legal Assessor for the Health Professions Council. She also has experience of coroners' inquests.

Kate is authorised to accept instructions from members of the public in certain circumstances.  She also accepts instructions from in-house lawyers, licensed access clients, and authorised professionals.  More information on how to instruct Kate directly can be found here.

 

Memberships:

Criminal Bar Association

Association of Regulatory and Disciplinary Lawyers

Standing Counsel of Mediation Advocates (SCMA)

 

Notable Cases

Crime
Case name R v Janato & Others
Appearance Defence
Category Robbery
Detail Alleged to have committed cashpoint robbery with man who killed headmaster Philip Lawrence when only recently released on licence for murder. Acquitted.
Case name R v Aitcheson & Aitcheson
Appearance Prosecution
Category Firearms
Detail Importation and supply of firearms to further crime by rival south London gangs. Involved new weapon not seen by NABIS or FSS before and required expert evidence on interpretation of s.5 Firearms Act to set precedent for future cases.
Case name R v Seagar and 9 others
Appearance Leading counsel for the prosecution
Category Serious violence
Detail Trial of 10 defendants in prearranged fight using knives causing near fatal injuries.
Case name R v O'Reilly
Appearance Prosecution
Category
Detail Mortgage fraud; £3million obtained.
Case name R v Moulden
Appearance Defence
Category Confiscation
Detail Reported case. Prosecution appeal to the Court of Appeal in attempt to confiscate an additional £500,000 in realisable assets. Defence successfully argue point of potential widespread application.
Case name R v Karaboue
Appearance Leading counsel for the defence
Category Fraud
Detail Fraud across UK, France and Cote d'Ivoire relating to computer equipment purchases.
Case name R v Lynch
Appearance Defence (led by QC)
Category Fraud
Detail Billed by many as the criminal trial of 2007, and the first prosecution of corruption within the "Sport of Kings" this fraud involved allegations of race fixing by the champion jockey (Kieren Fallon) and five others.
Professional Discipline
Case name GMC v Lauffer
Appearance For Regulator
Category
Detail Presenting GMC's case against a consultant surgeon, represented by leading QC, who was investigated following multiple patient deaths after laparoscopic surgery. Surgeon found to have acted outside his area of competence and to have been dishonest when working while on restricted duties.
Case name GMC v Dr Baghdady
Appearance For Regulator
Category
Detail Presented lengthy and complex misconduct and performance case involving several allegations arising out of the provision of out of hours medical services.